home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1558>
- <title>
- Apr. 26, 1993: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Apr. 26, 1993 The Truth about Dinosaurs
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- The Political Interest,Page 38
- Tap Israel to Help Russia
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> This just in: Supporting freedom doesn't come free. Bill
- Clinton wants more money for Russia--$1.8 billion in new funds
- beyond the $1.6 billion the President promised Boris Yeltsin in
- Vancouver. Where's the money going to come from?
- </p>
- <p> Mostly from Congress, via an emergency appropriation,
- White House officials predict. But selling the idea of new
- foreign aid is the political equivalent of root canal. Luckily,
- however, an alternative exists, a reallocation of the $15
- billion the U.S. sends abroad each year--funds still
- disaccording to a formula established when the old world order
- flourished.
- </p>
- <p> Trouble is, redirecting a substantial amount of foreign
- aid would require slicing Israel's annual $3 billion stipend,
- which strikes most elected officials as a prescription for
- political suicide. "It's not an option we're considering," Al
- Gore says flatly. "But it should be," says a White House aide,
- who hints that the Administration is "considering how and when
- we might step on the third rail" of foreign assistance.
- Jerusalem's take "may be safe this year, but that's it. Israel's
- going to have to take a hit sometime soon."
- </p>
- <p> He's right, and here's why. Aid to Israel comes in two
- forms. Of the $1.8 billion in military assistance, about 70%
- must be spent on U.S.-made equipment and weapons. "That's
- untouchable," says a senior State Department official. "It
- creates jobs in the U.S., which in case you haven't noticed is
- what the Clinton Administration is supposed to be all about."
- The remaining $1.2 billion in economic aid is harder to justify
- now that Israel is flush. Foreign investment is flowing in, the
- growth rate is a phenomenal 6%, and the $10 billion in loan
- guarantees finally granted by George Bush last year has
- permitted Israel to borrow from private banks at favorable
- rates. The country is doing so well that the government has
- asked the Israel Bonds Organization to curtail sales; the loan
- guarantees are a much better way to raise capital.
- </p>
- <p> In public, Israel's leaders remain apoplectic about a
- decline in U.S. aid. Privately, though, some Israeli politicians
- are dying to be asked to do their bit for the new world order.
- "We could take a shot and gain a lot of goodwill," says one,
- "but it all depends on the peace process."
- </p>
- <p> So he's saying peace would make cutting aid to Israel
- easier, right? Wrong. It's just the opposite. "Consider the
- northern front," explains Ze'ev Chafets, an Israeli journalist
- who served as spokesman for the late Prime Minister Menachem
- Begin. "If we give the Golan Heights back to Syria, we'll have
- to build expensive new defenses close by." Never mind that
- Israel could finance such projects itself; the post-peace game
- would be played differently. "If peace happens," says Chafets,
- "we'll be looking for more American money, not less--just like
- we got from Jimmy Carter after we made peace with Egypt."
- </p>
- <p> Three years ago, Senate Republican leader Bob Dole bravely
- suggested reducing Israel's aid: "Can't we convince our friends...it is in their interest too to help insure against a
- failure of new democracies and free-market economies?" No one
- even tried. "Dole was right," says a Clinton adviser, "and the
- argument's going to be made again now that we want new money for
- Yeltsin. The question is whether we'll have the guts to make the
- case ourselves or whether we'll piggyback on Congress"--assuming, of course, that Congress prefers the third rail to
- root canal.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-